BYU Will Always Be The Underdog: How Tecmo Super Bowl Explains Utah’s Dominance

(Editor’s note: Bryson Kearl is a diehard BYU fan, but as he was ramming his head into a New York hotel wall this past Saturday night, the following article came to him. It is a hard truth, but to him it is truth, nonetheless.)

I am really good at Tecmo Super Bowl. So good that I have won the Super Bowl in Tecmo with every single NFL team (in existence when the game was made). I have two advantages in the game. The first is experience. I have played thousands and thousands of games on Tecmo. The second advantage is that I am a human being. In other words, I am the Utah Utes of Tecmo Super Bowl.

Let me explain.

For those of you unaware, Tecmo Super Bowl is a football video game from the original Nintendo (NES). It was released in 1991, around the time when teams like the 49ers, Giants, Redskins, and Bills dominated the league. For me, TSB on NES is the GGEP (greatest gaming experience possible). That tells you both how much I love the game, and also how little gaming I’ve done in the last decade. (Note: Tecmo could be replaced with games like Madden for the sake of the following argument. I am using the example of Tecmo simply because it is my personal favorite.)

I used to play Tecmo for countless hours when I wasn’t in school, or when I was sick, or when the sun came up that day, etc. etc. I oftentimes played against friends or my brother, but more times than not, I played against the computer (CPU). I even had a friend who would come over to my house to watch me play the CPU for hours at a time. Occasionally I would turn to him and say, “Brian, are you sure you don’t want to play?” He always said no; I was that good. When I was a freshman in college I told someone how good I was and they told me they could beat me. He talked up a big game, and he even had the game ready in his apartment when we went straight there. By the time we kicked off I was legitimately nervous. I beat him by a score of something like 35-0.

The great thing about the CPU was that it never got sick of playing me. It never said, “I’m tired of this,” or “Let’s go do something else,” or “Wanna’ play Mario instead?” Accordingly, I developed a real rivalry with the CPU. There probably isn’t a single bad thing that a BYU or Utah fan has said to each other that I didn’t say to the CPU over the years of our rivalry. (And did I throw my controller from time and time and kick the Nintendo in disgust? You betcha’. But I always followed my tantrums by giving the NES a good blow.) But there is one thing I never called the CPU that this week I realized is an accurate thing to call it: BYU.

BYU is possibly the most unique school in the country. Obviously the honor code plays a big part in their uniqueness, but the fact that they try (and on occasion succeed) to compete in major sports like football despite the honor code is truly peculiar. Here they take athletes that could go to other schools and do virtually anything they want, and they convince them to come to Provo, UT and live what the outside world views a monastery lifestyle.

How do they pull this off? Well, for starters, they convince their athletes to—if I may steal a Mormon term—turn off the “natural man.” They teach them to maintain discipline in every aspect of their life. They attempt to turn their athletes into (what the outside world views as) something like a religious robot. Or, for the sake of my analogy, computers. The outside world views BYU as people who walk and talk in blind faith, almost as if they were programmed to do so. And in order to preserve a competitive sports program their teams kind of have to do that. Otherwise, they can’t play (read: Brandon Davies). True, some players frankly ignore the honor code, but only an outright hater would argue that the honor code doesn’t affect most players’ psyche.

It’s said that teams take on the character of their coach. Let’s look at an actual quote given by BYU’s football coach Bronco Mendenhall. As you read this ask yourself, “Does this sound like a football coach, or some sort of advanced robot, programmed to coach football?”

“We have a baseline established. Now there’s a clear reference point on truly where we are after working against someone else besides ourselves. It’s my job now, with this coaching staff, to diagnose exactly what the areas are that need improvement, the players that need improvement, the areas of game management that can be handled better.”

Thanks Bronco; couldn’t have said it better myself. If BYU athletes (and teams) are comparable to computers, this has never been as true as it is right now. And Bronco’s job security is far from in doubt, so it’s safe to assume the team will maintain this identity for the foreseeable future.

Enforcing and reinforcing discipline and focus, and diagnosing reference points and baselines works fine to a certain point, as evidenced by the success that Mendenhall has enjoyed to this point in his career. But clearly rivalry games are different from other games.

In Tecmo, the CPU clearly understands the game better than me. It clearly has skills I’m not even aware of, and it should certainly beat me more often than I beat it. And yet it almost never does. Why is that? Well, for starters, it is always conservative. To the extreme. It plays a certain, lifeless, yet calculated game with exactness regardless of the opponent or the conditions. It lacks the ability to match my hatred, determination, and blood lust that I clearly have for it. And how could it? It’s a computer. It simply lacks a killer’s instincts. And it can’t just all of a sudden acquire that instinct. It’s like the dork in Saving Private Ryan who knows both the English and German language with fluency, but doesn’t know the first thing about how to survive in a war when suddenly thrust into it. Book smarts—er—computer smarts are not street smarts. Football requires both.

Real life BYU players are not actually computers, true. But they come pretty darn close sometimes, or at least they put on that façade. They have to. And when you’re programmed one way for so long, and all of a sudden you’re facing somebody like Utah who has bloodlust at all times for you, it can cause you to freeze (yes, just like a computer). Sure you may appear to be amped and excited (and bloodlusty) on the outside, but inside you’re on unfamiliar grounds. We all saw that in the first drive of this past weekend’s game (and the second, and the third).

We also saw a complete lack of killer’s instincts the past two years (and in 2006) when BYU got ahead early. Rather than go for the kill, they played the numbers games like any computer would, all along not realizing that this was not a time for probabilities and conservatism. It was time to go for blood. The BYU football program trains computerized athlete missionaries, but rivalry football requires killers.

Utah gets that. When they get ahead on BYU, they don’t let off the gas. They jet into a higher gear and point the vehicle straight for Cosmo’s face. They simply aren’t constrained like BYU is. They are encouraged to let their instincts (their natural man) take over. To harness and manipulate the hyper-emotion that comes with a rivalry game. And as much as I hate to say this, they are very good at it. I know because I play the exact same way in Tecmo.

Anyone familiar with Tecmo can explain what it means when the CPU goes into “Hell no mode.” Hell no mode (HNM) is where the computers seems determined to beat you no matter what: Forcing multiple fumbles from you, all of a sudden becoming twice as fast as you (or going into “Bo Jackson speed”), calling your play five times in a row, and so forth. Sometimes the CPU is just too good.

Sometimes when the CPU goes into HNM, I can’t avoid losing. There are limits on how much my human advantage can do for me. And so it is with the BYU-Utah rivalry. Sometimes BYU is just too good for Utah to beat, regardless of the natural advantages Utah has in the game.

Quick, think of the last time BYU beat the Utes even though Utah was the favorite. Okay, what did you come up with? You probably couldn’t think of anything, could you? When BYU is better than Utah, they have a chance. When they are either even or Utah is better, Utah will win (and has won for two decades now). Just like in Tecmo.

The last time BYU blew out Utah was 1996. That year BYU went 14-1 (best record in the nation), and finished the season ranked #5 in the nation. The time before that was when Ty Detmer hailed as the singular most dominant QB in the nation. And before that BYU was always way better than Utah.

Here’s where the bad news comes for BYU fans. The bridge between BYU and Utah that once existed is gone. With Utah’s recent success, and with their Pac 12 residence, they are probably never going to be that much worse (or worse at all) than BYU. In other words, BYU may never blow out Utah again, but Utah is certainly in a position to repeat 54-10.

Utah’s program is built to beat BYU. The Utes put out a team of fast athletes, while BYU has talented, disciplined—yet rarely fast—players. If you’ve played Tecmo, you probably know all too well about Bo Jackson. The makers of Tecmo (partially accurately) made Bo Jackson way faster than everyone else on the field by a lot, giving anyone who picked the Raiders as their team a real advantage. Well, like in Tecmo, the speed issue causes real problems for BYU.

Add it all up and the future “Holy Wars” look bleak for BYU. With Utah’s emergence as a national power, the natural human advantages Utah has (that BYU desperately lacks), and Bo Jackson, BYU will always be an underdog against Utah under the current regime. BYU, like my dusty old NES, has seen its best days come and go. Sad, but true.


Bryson Kearl is a BYU alumnus. His favorite team to play with on Tecmo is the Buffalo Bills. Like his Cougars, the Bills have mastered the art of ripping their fans’ hearts out at the most inopportune times.

This entry was posted in College Football. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to BYU Will Always Be The Underdog: How Tecmo Super Bowl Explains Utah’s Dominance

  1. Howie says:

    Here we go again. Another myopic declaration of BYU being the only place where morality exists. And used once again as an excuse. Old story.

  2. Eric says:

    Not only that Howie, but this myopia exists to satisfy an ego that thinks that BYU was some dominant force in college football. Listen, BYU was good, real good, from the late 70’s to the early 90’s, consistently. They got the 84 national championship (with about 50 asterisks next to it) and beat Utah something good in those years. Outside of that timeframe, including from the mid-90’s until now, BYU has been IRRELEVANT. They have a very poor record against the highest level of competition, including bowl games (one of the worst in the nation). Before and after that period of time, Utah was the one that was/is better. To a BYU fan, football history starts in the late 70’s, nothing before that time happened in recorded history. Utah thoroughly dominated BYU until then and has once again returned to those ways from the late 90’s until now.

    BYU has been stuck in neutral for a long while, Bronco has led them to some good records against very weak competition. They’ve gone to the occasional Las Vegas Bowl and even won it a couple times over middle to bottom tier Pac-10 teams. But they have done absolutely NOTHING of national prominence. They haven’t sniffed a BCS bowl, they are almost never in discussion as one of the top programs in the west, let alone the country. They overhype their team every spring and summer only to fall flat on its face early in the year. Now they will beat up on some HORRIBLE teams from the WAC, inflate their numbers and egos so they can rinse and repeat the process again.

    BYU clings to this “moral superiority” complex to rationalize their mediocre football program. Their coach speaks of priorities and football coming in 5th. Give me a break, you are literally insane if you think that BYU football players cant do whatever they like whenever. They get into just as much trouble as any other team. How many times have we heard about BYU players being arrested or kicked off the team for “honor code violations,” too many to list on both hands and feet. What the author fails so badly to realize in this article is that BYU players ARE HUMAN and because of that they are susceptible to the same temptations as any other person on this planet. Often times they do fall prey to those temptations and give in and BYU either covers it up or punish’s the player very publicly under the strong arm of their “honor code.”

    The truth is that BYU started falling behind Utah in football sometime in the early 2000’s, once Utah hired Urban Meyer they took a massive leap and havent looked back. If you look at the scores in their rivalry, BYU wins by the skin of its teeth when they do win. Utah has the ability to blow them out and has several times in the last decade. BYU is so far in the rear view mirror Cosmo looks like a little brown smudge.

    • thevangundy says:

      Thanks Eric for your obviously unbiased view. We won’t respond to your comments about the article itself since you apparently didn’t read anything that didn’t fit your argument. We also won’t respond to your apparent grudge against BYU’s honor code. But regarding BYU’s success since the early 90s, can we assume you don’t count 1996? Or 2001, when, until their best player (and Doak Walker Award winner) went down with an injury BYU was a top ten team (and clearly sniffing the BCS). Or the time two years ago when they beat #3 Oklahoma?

    • Anonymous says:

      If you honestly don’t believe the honor code has anything to do with the type of players that BYU can recruit then you are not only blind but you are stupid. very stupid. Many many players have thought about coming here only to go somewhere else where they didn’t have to live that code. You are also stupid because you contradict yourself. You say players can do anything they want even with the honor code and then you mention that they get kicked off the team for disobeying it. So not only are you now stupid, but you are also a poor debater. I agree that that Utah has more room to become great because of the rules or the arena in which they play. I’ll take a vast majority of my favorite team obeying a moral standard that I believe in and losing some games over a team with a vast majority of its players who don’t come close to living up to what I think is morally right and winning more games. Yes, A LOT of players on the Utes are good, moral people. But I guarantee you it is not the majority. BYU will always be more limited than Utah because of the honor code.

    • I agree that Utah got a slight edge with Urban Meyer, but the notion that they have permanently left BYU behind seems silly.

      When BYU won 19 out of 21 of the rivalry games from 1972 to 1992, one might be forgiven for thinking that BYU had pulled away forever. That turned out not to be the case. If those two decades can be written off as a temporary surge, then surely the 4-3 edge that Utah has since the start of the Mendenhall/Whittingham era doesn’t seem to indicate that any particular team has left the other in the dust.

      That’s part of why this rivalry is so great. In a given year, the teams are frequently evenly-matched. However, even when one team gets a definitive edge, the edge never lasts long compared to the length of the rivalry (i.e. over the course of decades or years, it all evens out).

      • In fact, I believe that this rivalry is older and more important than many of the other metrics of success. The rivalry started before the MWC title even existed. The rivalry started before the WAC was formed. The rivalry started before the BCS system was invented and subsequently widely despised. The rivalry itself is one of the oldest, most stable institutions in college football.

        Of course, once BYU wins again, that will be sufficient to prove that BYU is better and always has been better in every way. This, as the author knows, is the prerogative that fans get when their team wins.

      • thevangundy says:

        The simple facts are that BYU’s constant underachieving against Utah indicates that unless something drastic changes they will always be at a disadvantage. When BYU has been the favorite, they have either lost or barely (miraculously) won. When the two teams are even or Utah is the favorite, Utah wins, without exception. Utah has won seven of the last ten. They’ve outscored BYU by an average score of 10.5 over that span. The 4/3 record doesn’t tell the whole story, at all. In the Mendenhall/Whittingham era, when Utah wins they win by an average of 19 points. When BYU wins, they win by an average of 4 points.

        Sure it may not always be the case, but that doesn’t mean things don’t appear to be headed that way.

  3. Any BYU fan that likes the Bills is fine by me. Great piece. GO UTES!

  4. Troy says:

    The fact that you are trying to provide analysis when Tecmo is your world, and the fact that you’ve probably never sniffed any sort of ball field is laughable, and therefore your comparison is Moronic at Best. Play your video games, watch your team, and quit trying to sound like you have even the first clue about football.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s